The summaries are free for public
use. The Chronic Liver Disease
Foundation will continue to add and
archive summaries of articles deemed
relevant to CLDF by the Board of
Trustees and its Advisors.
Abstract Details
Validation of a Simple Quality-of-Life Score for Identification of Minimal and Prediction of Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy
Mette Munk Lauridsen 1, Peter Jepsen 2, Charlotte Wilhelmina Wernberg 1, Ove B Schaffalitzky de Muckadell 3, Jasmohan S Bajaj 4, Hendrik Vilstrup 2
Author information
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University Hospital of South Denmark Esbjerg Denmark.
2Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark.
3Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Odense University Hospital Odense C Denmark.
4Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Virginia Commonwealth University and McGuire VA Medical Center Richmond VA.
Abstract
Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) is underdiagnosed because most clinics refrain from psychometric testing. Diagnostic activities need to go up so patients with MHE can get the treatment their condition requires. The sickness impact profile questionnaire for covert hepatic encephalopathy (SIPCHE) score is based on quality-of-life outcomes and has been proposed as a simple, patient-administered diagnostic score for grade 1 and MHE. Validate the SIPCHE for MHE identification and overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) prediction. 110 patients with liver cirrhosis (age 60 years, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score of 11.4, 80% blue-collar) provided information for SIPCHE scoring: gender, age, and four SIP statements: "I do not maintain balance (physically)," "I act irritable or impatient with myself," "I am not doing any of the usual physical recreation or activities," and "I am eating much less than usual." MHE was diagnosed using an abnormal continuous reaction time test and/or portosystemic encephalopathy syndrome test score. Patients were followed for 2.7 years on average. SIPCHE score positivity had high sensitivity (82%) but low specificity (38%) for MHE detection. Patients with an abnormal SIPCHE had a higher incidence of OHE during follow-up (35% vs. 14%, P = 0.05). OHE prediction sensitivity was 87% and exclusion sensitivity was 85%. The patients with an abnormal SIPCHE had twice as many subsequent episodes of OHE, and despite their high mortality, also a higher risk. An abnormal SIPCHE had a high sensitivity and low specificity for MHE identification. An abnormal SIPCHE was associated with a more than doubled risk of OHE, even with death as a competing event. SIPCHE could be used as a high-sensitivity, low-cost, surrogate marker of MHE in clinics without availability of psychometric tests and allow more patients to benefit from anti-MHE treatment.