Author information
1Division of Transplant Surgery University of Maryland Baltimore Maryland USA.
2Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) Richmond Virginia USA.
3AMRA Medical AB Linköping Sweden.
4Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences Linkoping University Linköping Sweden.
5Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology VCU Richmond Virginia USA.
6Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA.
7Department of Internal Medicine VCU Richmond Virginia USA.
8University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.
Abstract
Background and aim: Quantification of body compartments, particularly the interaction between adipose tissue and skeletal muscle, is emerging as novel a biomarker of metabolic health. The present study evaluated the impact of liver transplant (LT) on body compartments.
Methods: Totally 66 adult LT recipients were enrolled in whom body compartments including visceral adipose tissue (VAT), abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT), muscle fat infiltration (MFI), fat-free muscle volume (FFMV), and liver fat (LF) were quantified via whole body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). To provide non-LT comparison, each LT recipient was matched to at least 150 non-LT controls for same sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) from the UK Biobank registry.
Results: LT recipients (vs matched non-LT controls) had significantly higher subcutaneous (13.82 ± 5.47 vs 12.10 ± 5.10 L, P < 0.001) and visceral fat (7.59 ± 3.75 vs 6.72 ± 3.06 L, P = 0.003) and lower LF (5.88 ± 7.14 vs 8.75 ± 6.50%, P < 0.001) and muscle volume (11.69 ± 2.95 vs 12.12 ± 2.90 L, P = 0.027). In subgroup analysis, patients transplanted for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) cirrhosis (vs non-MASH cirrhosis) had higher ASAT, VAT, and MFI. A trend toward higher LF content was noted; however, this did not reach statistical significance (6.90 ± 7.35 vs 4.04 ± 6.23%, P = 0.189). Finally, compared with matched non-LT controls, patients transplanted for MASH cirrhosis had higher ASAT and VAT; however, FFMV and MFI were similar.
Conclusion: Using non-LT controls, the current study established the higher-than-expected adiposity burden among LT recipients, which is even higher among patients transplanted for MASH cirrhosis. These findings provide data needed to design future studies developing radiomics-based risk-stratification strategies in LT recipients.