Author information
1Department of Oncology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, Milan, Italy.
2San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-Tiget), IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute Hospital, Milan, Italy.
3Department of Internal Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Himeji Hospital, Himeji, Japan.
4Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
5Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan.
6Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
7Department of Oncology, ASAN Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
8Department of Medical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.
9Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
10Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
11Liver Unit-CHTMAD, Vila Real, Portugal.
12Unit of Medical Oncology 2, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
13Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
14Oncology Unit 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
15Department of Nursing, Gifu Kyoritsu University, Japan.
16Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Milan, Italy.
17Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
18Department of Internal Medicine, Ospedale di Faenza, Faenza, Italy.
19Department of Gastroenterology and Metabology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan.
20Department of Gastroenterology, Okayama City Hospital, Okayama, Japan.
21Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kagawa University, Kagawa, Japan.
22Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
23Department of Hepatology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan.
24Department of Gastroenterology, Asahi General Hospital, Asahi, Japan.
25Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Osaka, Japan.
26Center of Gastroenterology, Teine Keijinkai Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
27Department of Gastroenterology, Saiseikai Niigata Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
28Department of Gastroenterology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
29Hepato-biliary Center, Japanese Red Cross Matsuyama Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
30Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
31Department of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Takamatsu Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan.
32Department of Internal medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan.
33Department of Gastroenterology, Gunma Saiseikai Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi, Japan.
34Department of Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Takasaki General Medical Center, Takasaki, Japan.
35Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Otakanomori Hospital, Kashiwa, Japan.
36Department of Hepatology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
37Gastroenterology Center, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan.
38Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
39Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Takasaki General Medical Center, Takasaki, Japan.
40Medical Oncology, University and University Hospital of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
41Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB) and lenvatinib can be alternatively used as first-line systemic treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, no direct comparison of the two regimens has been performed in randomized clinical trials, making the identification of baseline differential predictors of response of major relevance to tailor the best therapeutic option to each patient. Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics of real-world AB-treated HCC patients were analyzed in uni- and multivariate analyses to find potential prognostic factors of overall survival (OS). Significant variables were incorporated in a composite score (α-FAtE) and it was tested for specificity and sensitivity in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and in multivariate analysis for OS. The score was applied in uni- and multivariate analyses for OS of a comparable lenvatinib-treated HCC population. Finally, comparison between treatments was performed in patients with low and high α-FAtE scores and predictivity estimated by interaction analysis. Time-to-progression (TTP) was a secondary endpoint. OS of AB-treated HCC patients was statistically longer in those with α-fetoprotein <400 ng/mL (HR 0.62, p = .0407), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) <125 IU/L (HR 0.52, p = .0189) and eosinophil count ≥70/μL (HR 0.46, p = .0013). The α-FAtE score was generated by the sum of single points attributed to each variable among the above reported. In ROC curve analysis, superior sensitivity and specificity were achieved by the score compared to individual variables (AUC 0.794, p < .02). Patients with high score had longer OS (HR 0.44, p = .0009) and TTP (HR 0.34, p < .0001) compared to low score if treated with AB, but not with lenvatinib. Overall, AB was superior to lenvatinib in high score patients (HR 0.55, p = .0043) and inferior in low score ones (HR 1.75, p = .0227). At interaction test, low α-FAtE score resulted as negative predictive factor of response to AB (p = .0004). In conclusion, α-FAtE is a novel prognostic and predictive score of response to first-line AB for HCC patients that, if validated in prospective studies, could drive therapeutic choice between lenvatinib and AB.