Author information
1Department of Upper GI, Division of Hepatology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
2Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
3Medical School, the University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.
4Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
5Nutrition and Metabolism, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
6Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
7Center for Cohort Studies, Total Healthcare Center, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
8Department of Hepatology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
9Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
10Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
11College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
12Baylor College of Medicine and Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
13NAFLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Epidemiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
14Independent consultant, Nottingham, UK.
15National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
16Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
17Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
18Leeds Institute for Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
19Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
20Department of Internal Medicine, Stravitz-Sanyal Institute of Liver Disease and Metabolic Health, VCU School of Medicine and Health System and Division of Gastroenterology, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
21Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Saarland, Homburg, Germany.
22Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
23The Roger Williams Institute of Hepatology, Foundation for Liver Research, Kings College London.
24Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
25Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
26Department of Medicine, Division of Hepatology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
27Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
28Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
29Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
30Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
31Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.
32School of Public Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
33Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Medical Centre, Tel Aviv, Israel.
34Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
35University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
36CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy (CUNY SPH), New York, New York, USA.
37Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Abstract
Background: Following the adoption of new nomenclature for steatotic liver disease, we aimed to build consensus on the use of International Classification of Diseases codes and recommendations for future research and advocacy.
Methods: Through a two-stage Delphi process, a core group (n = 20) reviewed draft statements and recommendations (n = 6), indicating levels of agreement. Following revisions, this process was repeated with a large expert panel (n = 243) from 73 countries.
Results: Consensus ranged from 88.8% to 96.9% (mean = 92.3%).
Conclusions: This global consensus statement provides guidance on harmonizing the International Classification of Diseases coding for steatotic liver disease and future directions to advance the field.