The summaries are free for public
use. The Chronic Liver Disease
Foundation will continue to add and
archive summaries of articles deemed
relevant to CLDF by the Board of
Trustees and its Advisors.
Abstract Details
Implications of the new nomenclature of steatotic liver disease and definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
1MASLD Research Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
2Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
3School of Public Health, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
4Medical Data Analytic Centre, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
5State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Abstract
Background: The American and European liver associations have endorsed new nomenclature of steatotic liver disease (SLD) and definition of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).
Aims: To review the historical development leading to the changes and to discuss the implications of the changes on research and clinical practice METHODS: We performed a literature search using keywords related to MASLD and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
Results: The SLD umbrella allows classification of patients under the key categories of MASLD, alcohol-associated liver disease and a new entity termed MetALD, which represents MASLD with increased alcohol intake. The diagnosis of MASLD requires the demonstration of hepatic steatosis and at least one metabolic risk factor, whereas MASLD can co-exist with other liver diseases such as chronic viral hepatitis. Despite the change in definition, over 95% of patients previously known as having NAFLD fulfil diagnostic criteria for MASLD. It is conceivable that future clinical trials and biomarker studies will continue to exclude concomitant liver diseases. As most patients with MASLD are seen at primary care and non-hepatology settings, communication with other stakeholders is essential to ensure disease awareness and smooth adoption of the changes.
Conclusions: The new nomenclature is both a challenge, given the need for dissemination and education across the spectrum of stakeholders, and an opportunity to bring everyone together and spark new research to better understand epidemiology, natural history, diagnosis, biomarkers and management strategies across the spectrum of SLD.